11/27/2023 0 Comments Amd ryzen 3![]() It can nearly max out framerates in most games with a single GTX 1080 Ti, but it also costs basically twice as much as the Ryzen 3 CPUs. ![]() Our best gaming CPU recommendation continues to be Intel's i5-7600K, a 4-core/4-thread CPU capable of high 4.9-5.0GHz clockspeeds when overclocked. There are also games where the lack of SMT on Ryzen 3 appears to help relative to the 4-core Ryzen 5 chips, with about a third of the games performing slightly better on Ryzen 3, and minimum fps (on the 1500X in particular) suggests some sort of resource contention might be going on. The only real deviation where the Ryzen 3 parts are clearly doing better than Core i3 is Dishonored 2. Minimum framerates are mostly similar to the average fps. With the fastest current graphics card (not counting the Titan Xp), the overall difference is 58 percent going from the Ryto the i7-7700K, which isn't that large. With only four cores/threads, it has more processing power than a Core i3 for CPU-intensive tasks (see below), but in games Intel's Skylake/Kaby Lake architecture generally proves faster. Looking at the overall standings, Ryzen 3 obviously trails the fastest CPUs. More details on overclocking the Ryzen 3 chips is below. Overclocking tends to reduce the performance gap within the same core/thread counts for Ryzen, but the higher priced CPUs of each tier have always overclocked just a bit better-so the 1800X hit 4.0GHz while the 1700X and 1700 only reached 3.9GHz, for example. As you'd expect, the Ryzen 3 parts are the slowest of AMD's chips, befitting their budget price. (Note: the "97p" charts are for average minimum fps using the 97 percentile.)ĪMD has established the performance and pricing tiers for their Ryzen processors, and each increment comes with improved performance (though there's some overlap in places, eg, the 1300X and 1400). The Pentium G4560/4600 chips (2-core/4-thread) are also potential contenders, at even lower prices, though I haven't had time to finish retesting the G4560 yet so you'll have to refer back to the earlier data. The direct competition is Intel's Core i3 lineup, specifically the Core i3-7100 and Core i3-7350K. You can see the full testbed details for the Ryzen CPUs in the boxout to the right.įrom here on, I'll be focusing almost exclusively on the performance aspects of Ryzen 3. Using faster or slower RAM would naturally affect all systems to varying degrees. The important thing is that all systems are using the same parts, as much as possible, and my benchmarks are slanted toward the enthusiast side of things. It's a GeIL Evo X kit that AMD provided, which appears to be out of stock at most places now. Regardless, for my CPU testing, I've tried to keep things the same across all the systems, so I'm running single rank DDR4-3200 with 16-16-16-36-1T timings. Meanwhile, for DDR4-3200, which AMD tacitly recommends for Ryzen, the cheapest 16GB kit on Newegg goes for $136 right now, and if you want a top performance kit rated at DDR4-3200 and CL14, like G.Skill's Trident Z, that will set you back $167 (on sale from $187).įor Ryzen 7 and those looking for maximum performance, high-end memory can make sense, but on a budget part like Ryzen 3, I'd stick with DDR4-2666-and note that tightening the timings often has more of an impact than increasing bandwidth. Spending $20 more on memory for DDR4-3000 might be worthwhile, but that's also the difference in price between each level of Ryzen CPU (up until the fastest options). I will never buy into Intel's mind game that More Speed is better just to play a simple RGB game just because Intel's CPU is one nanosecond faster than the other.Bog standard DDR4 starts at 2133MHz, with a price of $102 for 16GB. AMD CPUs are both faster and cheaper, and why would anybody throw more money at an Intel CPU that might edge out AMDīy a nono second in 2023 when all Intell and AMD are doing is playing? The more Speed, the better the game. Since then, all my PCs have been AMD, and Intel never even comes into my mind when buying a new PC. Until 2007, all my PCs had Intel processors, and It was not Until the AMD K7 Athlon came out in 1999 when I bought my first AMD CPU PC, which smoked the Intel Pentium 4 that Intel had at the time. I can still remember how my eyes could not keep up with the Speed of how fast Pacman could run across the screen. My very first computer came with a 16-bit processor called the Intel 8086, and boy, was it fast.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |